Impresii dupa TestBash 2.0

Sandra Ilcus de la TdT Cluj a mers la TestBash 2.0 in Brighton, UK.
Iata niste impresii in urma conferintei:

“Imi pare bine ca am avut ocazia sa merg la conferinta, mi-a placut mult! 

Cu toate ca era “a one day testing conference”, nu a fost deloc vorba despre o singura zi. In seara dinainte, s-a organizat un pre-TestBash Meetup intr-un pub, unde am ajuns si eu. Mi-a placut ca lumea a fost foarte prietenoasa si gata sa isi impartaseasca experienta legata de testare, asa ca am socializat.

Conferinta propriu-zisa s-a tinut in Domul din Brighton, unde Lisa Crispin a facilitat cafeaua si ceaiul dinainte de inceperea prezentarilor. La 9:30, James Bach a inceput sa ne prezinte conceptul de “galumphing”, fiind urmat de Matt Archer, Seth Eliot, Amy Phillips, Bill Matthews, Tony Bruce si altii. Au fost multi speakeri, printre care nume destul de mari. 

Mi-a placut ca prezentarile erau scurte, de aproximativ 45 de min, iar doua-trei prezentari erau urmate de o pauza de jumatate de ora, in care puteai sa mergi si sa vorbesti cu speaker-ii. 
Mi-a placut prezentarea Lisei Crispin, pentru ca a fost interactiva, cerandu-le celor din public sa impartaseasca experiente despre cum au reusit sa invete/aprofundeze business-ul soft-ului pe care il testau. 
Un alt aspect care mi-a placut a fost faptul ca speaker-ii dadeau tot timpul exemple concrete legate de ce dificultati au intampinat ei, cum au incercat sa le rezolve, prin ce metode, astfel incat, personal, m-am “regasit” in multe dintre prezentari. 
Au fost si cateva prezentari care nu erau direct legate de testare, ci despre ce ne motiveaza pe noi, ca si testari, cum lucram bine intr-o echipa, cum diversi factori ne pot afecta munca, etc…

Conferinta s-a incheiat dupa-masa, dar a fost urmata de un post-TestBash Meetup intr-un alt pub. Din nou, schimb de experiente, zambete si voie-buna, schimb de carti de vizita, bere si lume multa.

As recomanda aceasta conferinta, mai ales ca este vorba de o zi, in care ai ocazia sa socializezi cu alti oameni, sa inveti lucruri noi, sa vorbesti direct cu speaker-ii.”

Mai multe detalii si la Ministry of Testing pe site: http://www.ministryoftesting.com/training-events/testbash/

Sa aveti o zi frumoasa,
Alina

TDT Monthly Meetup #13 – Timisoara

Multumim tuturor celor care s-au inscris la “Tabara de Testare” – Timisoara #13.
Ne intalnim astazi, Joi 21 Martie, la 18:30 la sediul ARIES-TM (Strada Paris nr2A(cladirea Iprotim , cea cu Registrul Comertului), etajul 4, camera 413).

Agenda:

  • 18:30 – 18:45 – Sosire participanți
  • 18:45 – 20:30 – Workshop Selenium WebDriver (part 1)

Participanți:

1. Alina Ionescu – Facilitator
2. Vlad Ilie
3. Bujanca Mihai
4. Oana Radomir
5. Cristian Boldisteanu
6. Biro Sandor
7. Paul Banias
8. Alexandru Zbarcea
9. Adrian Schiopu
10. Vasile Felnecan
11. Darco Turcu
12. Babau Marius
13. Ioan Nicoara
14. Ciprian Popescu
15. Oprisor Catalin
16. Sorin Ilinca
17. Borislav
18. Emilian
19. Loredana Flondor + 1
20. Alexandar Despotovici
21. Lavinia Muntean
22. Razvan Diaconescu
23. Alex Bostan
24. Larisa Bulugean
25. Irina Cristescu
26. Boros Liviu
27. Alexandra Nadasan
28. Loredana Burcas
29. Dusita Damian
30. Andrita Vlad
31. Camelia Detesan
32. Bogdan Orasan

Pentru mai multe detalii: http://www.meetup.com/Tabara-de-Testare-Timisoara/events/95059312/

TdT Cluj Monthly Meetup #11 – Testing Clinic

One challenge I see in organising Tabara de Testare is finding testers that want to share / present their stories. This is something that we struggle with quite often in Cluj, and I know that the other chapters are in a similar situation.

We came up with the following solution for the meetup organised in Cluj: if for a particular month we’re not able to find testers that want to present, we’re having a Testing Clinic, where every participant can come with their own testing / managing / scripting / teaching problem and discuss it with the other attendees.

We had two meetups with this format, and I think they turned out pretty OK as everybody who shared a problem left with some ideas (I saw them writing things down :-D).

I’d like to share with you my impressions and the things I remember from the second Testing Clinic, the one we had this month.

To give you some ideas about how it happened, we were 28 testers, we arranged the chairs in a circle / oval so that we have eye contact with each other, and we waited for someone to break the ice and start with a problem.

(For the sake of confidentiality, I won’t use the real name of the testers or the company they work for.)

Problem #1: “I need to make a demo for a possible client, about automating testing for their mobile application (iOS), but I don’t have the code for the app. Does any of you know any tool that can be used for a case like this?”

This is when the discussion began:

  • somebody said that they could look at Sikuli – http://www.sikuli.org/
  • others asked why they need to have a real demo, as they don’t have the app, and not go with some mockups?
  • others asked why they don’t ask for the code; if they want to make a demo, wouldn’t it make more sense to have a real demo and use the tools they will most probably be using during the project?

Problem #2: “I work on a medical software project, we have no automated scripts but I would like to start implementing some. One of the problems I have is that the management is afraid of doing test automation as they don’t know how it will impact our FDA and ISO certifications. How could I present this to the management?”

  • I shared a story from a medical software project I worked on, where I developed a tool that helped us verify some of the requirements (FDA requires that every requirement of the application needs to be covered by a test). In my case, I had to write a requirements document for my tool, and one other colleague to write a test plan and test my tool. This was required by FDA for the type of medical software that we were building, so I suggested that she checks FDA requirements for their project to see if they need to validate the automation tool.

Problem #3: “I have two teams of testers, team1 works on a mature project, is very organised and everything works fine; team 2 works on a startup project, they don’t use documentation to test, but follow developers instructions and then they do ad-hoc testing and don’t keep track of what they test. Team 2 have trouble giving status reports about their work, and also don’t test some important features asked by the client. For the moment the client is happy with what we deliver, the project manager is also happy, but I’m afraid that in 6 months when the project will be more complex, everything will fall apart. How can I sell the approach used by team 1 to the project manager from project 2?”. We asked some clarifying questions, and understood that he was the test manager for both teams.

  • this was the most discussed problem of the evening; after several questions, we were able to break the problem in two:
    • the testers from team 2 were not motivated to do a good job, and they didn’t want to improve their testing (as long as the client is happy, why should we change anything?)
    • the PM for project 2 was overwriting all the decisions taken by the test manager. The development process, so also the testing process, had been defined by the PM, and she was not willing to change anything
  • several solutions have been suggested for the “PM problem”:
    • go and meet the PM, to have a better relationship with her
    • if you think the quality of the product will suffer in the long run, escalate the problem to the PM’s boss
    • present the reports in such a way that the PM will understand that the testing team is not doing a good job (they don’t cover all the requirements, which causes patch delivery; if this will continue, and the product will grow, it’ll be hard to keep track of things)
    • implement changes and don’t tell the PM; use the results to show her the benefits
    • let the team fail once, and then use the results to show the PM what can happen if the testers are left by themselves (they used 2 weeks sprints, they were in an early stage of the product so it’s better to fail now than in 6 months)
  • several solutions have been suggested for the “team problem”:
    • make a documentation reading session, something like a book club where they could go through the user stories
    • find someone within the team that has the same values as you, and that is willing to help you improve the team’s work
    • go and work with them side by side; spend more time with this team to win their trust
    • go out for beer / dinner with the team, to get closer to them
    • when evaluating the testers, give them negative feedback and decrease their salary; if this won’t wake them up, they might leave the company which in long run might be beneficial
  • one of the testers asked how could he be sure that the approach used by team 1 will work for team 2; after all, they are two different teams, working on two different projects, with different PMs and different clients… His answer was that experience shows that team 1’s approach worked well so far, even on other projects, so from his point of view it will also work on this project.

Problem #4: “I noticed that some of the tests and test data I use on different projects (for example: valid addresses for every EU country, tests for using a Mastercard Card). How can I handle all this test data to be able to search through it if I need it on future projects?”.

After asking some clarifying questions, we found out that she doesn’t always remember that she previously tested a similar feature / project or had to use this kind of data, and she would like to have an easy way to search through her documents. Plus the other team members could benefit from her work.

  • one solution was to have all the documents put in a source control system, add tags or descriptions for each file, and then interrogate the SCM to see if something similar can be located. One downside of this approach would be that, depending on how you organise your test data, some files might have lots of tags. Another one is that people need to install SCM clients to access the data.
  • another solution was to have a wiki and enter the details there. As she wanted to search for text, wikis are very good for doing that, and they are also much nicer to use than SCMs (you only need a browser, and you don’t need to be a developer to understand how they work). Plus you can attach any type of files if needed…
    • a tester shared a story where he was bombed with questions from his fellow testers, so he decided to build a wiki and put the things he knew there. Even if he did that, his colleagues still preferred to come directly to him for information, so they come up with an idea to give incentives to people to use the wiki more: they added a Google Analytics account for every page, and the authors will get a bonus at the end of the month based on the number of views their pages had. Another good aspect, from his point of view, was that this way they could see which computers, and thus testers, use the wiki, and which don’t. I found this approach a little too much for me, as people might abuse of such a system, but he said that it has been working OK for them so far.

Problem #5: “I work remotely with a team from Finland, formed of an experienced test lead and several developers. I am the only tester in the office that works on this project. The remote team is not very communicative, moreover they have a culture for not disturbing people with too many questions. Even if they reply to my emails, I sometimes feel the need to talk to somebody about my work, but I don’t have who to talk to as I don’t want to bother the remote team too much, and the local team is too busy. What can I do in this case?”.

  • communicate more with the test lead – they do talk, but the test lead works on another project too, so she’s quite busy…
  • attend team’s meetings – because the developers don’t feel comfortable talking in English, they don’t do that. The test lead attends the meetings and sends her the meeting notes. The developers reply to emails / chat, but when it comes to spoken English they don’t have too much practice.
  • go there and meet the team – the team works remotely most of the time, so when she visited their office, most of them weren’t there. For example, she thinks she communicates better with one of the guys because she has had the chance to meet him.
  • find and use focusing – defocusing techniques to not feel bored.
  • find someone in the office you could talk to; I said that I find it hard to believe that everybody is so busy that she has nobody to talk to.

We had 4 testers that presented 5 problems within the 2.5 hours of the meetup, lots of new testers joining the conversation and presenting their ideas. I would like to thank the ones that dared to share their problems. I also want to thank the testers that joined the conversation and offered solutions.

At the end of this article I’d like to stress that this kind of format will not ensure that you’ll implement the ideas presented by the other participants, and that it’s up to you what you do with all this information. But I think it can be a great way to build an interactive discussion, and get input from testers working in different contexts.

Alex

P.S. the evening ended with 8 of us going for a drink and food, and discussing about strange customs from marriage, funeral and baptising ceremonies until midnight, which was a lot of fun 😀

TDT Monthly Meetup #11 – Timisoara

In primul rand: La multi ani! 🙂

Multumim tuturor celor care s-au inscris la “Tabara de Testare” – Timisoara #11.
Ne intalnim maine, joi 17 ianuarie 2013, la 18:30 la sediul ARIES-TM (Strada Paris nr2A(cladirea Iprotim , cea cu Registrul Comertului), etajul 4, camera 413).

Agenda:

  • 18:30 – 18:45 – Sosire participanți
  • 18:45 – 19:45– Prezentare “Making BDD fun with Ruby and Cucumber”
  • 19:45 – 20:00 – Discutii
  • 20:00 – 20:30 – Concluzii

Participanți:

1. Andrei Marfievici – “Making BDD fun with Ruby and Cucumb”
2. Adrian Mirea – Facilitator
3. Alina Ionescu
4. Oana Radomir
5. Ramona Baleti
6. Bogdan Orasan
7. Carmen Bonto
8. Groza Ioan + 1
9. Alexandru Zbarcea
10. Roxana Vornic
11. Babau Marius
12. Croitoru Andreea
13. Ioan Nicoara
14. Arpad Simo
15. Codruta
16. Flavius Prehar
17. Daniel Jurescu + 1
18. Adrian Vornic
19. Adela
20. Mihaela Lemeni + 1
21. Delia Cruceru
22. Alexandra Nadasan
23. Lavinia Muntean
24. Alexandar Despotovici
25. Loredana Burcas
26. Ciprian Spirea
27. Camelia Detesan

Ideas for 2013…

On the 5th of December the Cluj chapter had the last monthly meetup for 2012. We started the evening by discussing about the things we liked so far at TdT and what we’d like to do in the future.

Below is the list with the items we came up with:

  • longer meetings (ie: 1-2 days conferences – Peer conference or Open Space Conference) where we can go more in depth
  • more hands on sessions
    • testlab
    • workshops for different skills and tools (new cool & geeky stuff)
    • test clinic – where people can present their problems and the community can come up with possible solutions
    • non-technical sessions (critical thinking, communication, presentation)
  • industry/domain specific presentations
  • have talks about test management
  • bring cool and smart people to attend our sessions
  • bring non-testers to talk – business people, developers, sells, support
  • community beyond meetups for testing things – small workgroups that meet to discuss specific themes and problems
  • community beyond the meetups – go out and have beer with peer testers 🙂
  • have interactions between the TdT chapters
  • organize a testing camp
  • organize a real conference in Romania

This list is not prioritized in any way, it’s just a bunch of ideas that we put on paper and would be of interest for the local chapter.

I’d personally like to know how the members from other chapters see it, so please leave a comment with the items you find interesting and if you’d want to get involved.

Alex

TDT Peer Conference #10 – Timisoara – Anniversary Edition

First of all, thank you all for signing up for the “Tabara de Testare Timisoara #10 – Anniversary Edition”.
We meet at 6:30PM  at Haufe-Lexware (Bosch Communication Center Building, 8th, Calea Aradului, 3rd floor, Timisoara).

Agenda:

  • 18:30 – 18:45 – Participants arrival
  • 18:45 – 19:45 – “Business Process Testing: Bridging the gap between Business Analysts and Quality Assurance Engineer” Presentation by Eric Schmieder
  • 19:45 – 20:00 – Q&A
  • 20:00 – 20:20 – Conclusions and surprises 🙂

Participants:

1. Eric Schmieder – “Business Process Testing: Bridging the gap between business Analysts and Quality Assurance Engineers”
2. Alina Ionescu – Facilitator
3. Adrian Mirea – Facilitator
4. Alexandru Rotaru
5. Bogdan Solga
6. Radu Ticiu
7. Ramona Baleti
8. Bogdan Orasan
9. Andrei Savin
10. Amalia Pirvanescu +1
11. Gergo Debreczeni +1
12. Cristian Boldisteanu
13. Vornic Ioan
14. Alexandru Zbarcea
15. Oana Radomir
16. Marius Sebastian Trif +1
17. Croitoru Andreea
18. Roxana Vornic
19. Alexandru Pandi
20. Tudor Bejan
21. Claudia Minciuna
22. Bonto Carmen
23.Babau Marius
24. Cristina Potra-Muresan
25. Rascol Laurentiu
26. Sergiu Nicoara
27. Arpad Simo
28. Codruta
29. Flavius Prehar
30. Biro Sandor
31. Adela
32. Mihaela Lemeni +1
33. Dan Olariu
34. Adrian Schiopu
35. Roxana Novac
36. Adrian Vornic
37. Gabriel Mateescu
38. Oana BIRNA
39. Laura Socaciu
40. Cristian Bacican
41. Calin Pinter
42. Diana Chitic
43. Alin Groza
44. Georgiana Oana
45. Gabriel Gardas
46. Boros Liviu
47. Delia Cruceru
48. Lavinia Muntean
49. Alexandar Despotovici
50. Cosmin Alamorean
51. Lavinia Birta
52. Ciprian
53. Minodora Naniu
54. Nicoleta Schiopu

TDT Peer Conference #9 – Timisoara

Multumim tuturor celor care s-au inscris la “Tabara de Testare” – Timisoara #9.
Ne intalnim la 18:30 la sediul ARIES-TM (Strada Paris nr2A(cladirea Iprotim , cea cu Registrul Comertului), etajul 4, camera 413).

Agenda:

  • 18:30 – 18:45 – Sosire participanți
  • 18:45 – 19:20– Prezentare “Meetup #9 – Prezentare ISTQB – Test Manager”
  • 19:20 – 19:50 – Discutii
  • 19:50 – 20:00 – Concluzii

Participanți:

1. Ramona Baleti – “Prezentare ISTQB – Test Manager”
2. Alina Ionescu – Facilitator
3. Adrian Mirea
4. Oana Radomir
5. Vornic Ioan
6. Cristian Boldisteanu
7. Cristian Bacican
8. Dronca Livia
9. Babau Marius
10. Ioan Nicoara
11. Adela
12. Flavius Prehar
13. Sandor Biro
14. Adrian Vornic
15. Arpad Simo
16. Codruta
17. Iancu N. Ciprian
18. Roxana Novac
19. Dan Olariu
20. Mihaela Lemeni
21. Lavinia Muntean
22. Dana Vetan
23. Alin Groza
24. Bonto Carmen
25. George Tudor

 

 

Tabara de Testare Timisoara #8 – Post factum

Tabara de Testare Meetup #8 a fost una din intalnirile interesante. Dupa pauza in august, pe 20 septembrie am avut 33 de participanti. Subiectul a fost unul controversat, Certificarile ISTQB.

Ca de obicei am rugat unul din participanti sa scrie un post factum. De data aceasta am avut placerea sa fie un manager. Iata feedback-ul lui:

“- Locatia a fost ok, am simtit-o primitoare, fain ca a fost apa, cafea si rontzanele, am simtit ca suntem bineveniti
– Subiectul a fost interesant, am plecat cu informatii interesante si mi-e clar ca merita certificarea
– Oamenii mi-au placut, m-am simtit acceptat desi nu sunt un tester
– Mi-a placut atmosfera, am putut glumi, ceea ce e important pentru mine personal

Cateva chestii pe care nu le-am simtit
– Ideea cu cartonasele colorate mi se pare cam comunista, mai ales ca nu s-a respectat 100%, iar la un grup asa mic nu cred ca e nevoie
– Ideile pentru urmatoare meetinguri pe post-its mi s-au parut un pic fortate, de vreme ce se poate face asta lejer si asincron pe net”

de Cristian Boldisteanu

Multumim Cristian pentru feedback!
Referitor la cele doua lucruri care nu ti-au placut:
– cartonasele nu s-au folosit 100% pentru ca nu vrem sa fim agresivi in a le impune. Se folosesc daca oamenii vor sa le foloseasca, de data aceasta nu prea a fost nevoie. Ne-am gandit si noi de multe ori sa renuntam la ele, dar uneori sunt necesare.
– partea cu ideile pe post-it-uri s-a dovedit foarte utila, pana acum. Poti sa scrii o idee repede, atunci cand te gandesti la ea. Am observat ca oamenii reactioneaza mai greu cand li se cere sa puna ideile pe net. Binenteles, daca cineva vrea sa adauge idei ulterior, putem updata.

Ne auzim 🙂

 

TdT at Scientific and Entrepreneurial Picnic in Szeged

Vinerea trecuta, 21 Septembrie 2012, a avut loc un “picnic” la Szeged, unde s-au reunit membrii comunitatilor stiintifice si antreprenoriale din Timisoara si Szeged.

Cu aceasta ocazie am mers si noi sa prezentam Tabara de Testare. Iata aici un filmulet http://www.ustream.tv/channel/tudom%C3%A1nyos-%C3%A9s-%C3%9Czleti-piknik—tik (incepand de pe la minutul 2:40 pana la 10:30). Sunetul nu este cel mai bun, pentru ca erau multe alte corturi cu activitati galagioase, dar sper sa se inteleaga.

Mai jos si cele trei slide-uri din prezentarea noastra si ceva poze 🙂

 

TDT Peer Conference #8 – Timisoara

Multumim tuturor celor care s-au inscris la “Tabara de Testare” – Timisoara #8.
De aceasta data ne intalnim la sediul ARIES-TM (Strada Paris nr2A(cladirea Iprotim , cea cu Registrul Comertului), etajul 4, camera 413).

Agenda:

  • 18:30 – 19:00 – Sosire participanți
  • 19:00 – 19:30 – Prezentare “Meetup #8 – Prezentare ISTQB”
  • 19:30 – 20:00 – Discutii
  • 20:00 – 20:10 – Concluzii + Stabilirea temelor viitoare

Participanți:

1. Alexandar Despotovici – “Prezentare ISTQB”
2. Adrian Mirea – Facilitator
3. Maria Iosu
4. Alina Ionescu
5. Lavinia Muntean
6. Ramona Baleti
7. Daniel Amitis + guest
8. Amelia Ianculescu
9. Alina Stanila
10. Dusita Giurgev
11. Alexandru Zbarcea
12. Dan Olariu
13. Roxana Novac
14. Flavius Prehar
15. Ciprian
16. Mihaela Lemeni
17. Arpad Simo
18. Lavinia Perian
19. Codruta
20. Claudia Minciuna
21. Ioan Nicoara
22. Ciprian Spirea
23. Maria Constantinescu + guest
24. Cristian Boldisteanu
25. Haloiu Valentin-Costel
26. Adela
27. Alin Groza
28. Carmen Bonto
29. Boros Liviu